<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Governance on Shen Ting Ang</title><link>https://shenting.org/tags/governance/</link><description>Recent content in Governance on Shen Ting Ang</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.6</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://shenting.org/tags/governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Good Governance Is Good Design</title><link>https://shenting.org/post/ai_governance/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://shenting.org/post/ai_governance/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="introduction">Introduction&lt;/h1>
&lt;p>Two days ago I co-moderated a roundtable on ISO 42001. Multiple questions were asking what is AI Governance: is it going to look like the worst parts of compliance - a checklist bolted on at the end, slowing things down, adding cost, and not really making anything safer?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Good AI governance is not a compliance tax. It&amp;rsquo;s good design. And once you frame it that way, a lot of the apparent tension between &amp;ldquo;moving fast&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;being responsible&amp;rdquo; disappears.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>